top of page
Search

ACIL Labels ICA’s Code Review Response a ‘Predictably Superficial”

The Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby (ACIL) has today released a groundbreaking report titled "Falling Short: Why the Industries Initial Response Fails to Deliver Meaningful Reform in the Code of Practice." This comprehensive analysis critiques the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA) initial response to the General Insurance Code of Practice Review, revealing systemic shortcomings that leave Australian consumers vulnerable.


Click the below link to access ACIL's Report



Key Findings:


  • Critical Recommendations Ignored: The first tranche of reforms does not address 49 critical recommendations from the Flood Inquiry, leaving key consumer protections unaddressed.

  • Lack of Transparency and Reform: The ICA’s response demonstrates a reluctance to embrace meaningful change, opting instead for superficial reforms that fail to address well-documented issues.

  • Systemic Misconduct: Expert reports are routinely manipulated to minimise claim payouts, leaving consumers at a significant disadvantage.\


ACIL Chairperson Tyrone Shandiman said, “The industry response is yet another predictable and concerning failure to address systemic issues in the insurance industry. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton threatened to 'intervene' in the market by breaking up big insurers—clear evidence that policymakers are fed up with the industry's failures. Consumers deserve stronger protections, and if the industry won’t act, we will. ACIL is prepared to take this fight to the court of public opinion, leveraging media, political engagement, and legal avenues. We are also reviewing a revelatory letter from a veteran industry insider that could prompt further action—potentially making the industry very uncomfortable.  If the industry doubts our capabilities, they need only look at our impact on the strata management sector. Watch this space!”


The report outlines actionable recommendations for the ICA, ASIC, and elected representatives, including stronger regulatory oversight, increased transparency, and proactive measures to prevent future abuses. It also calls on ASIC to withhold sign-off on the revised Code of Practice until meaningful reforms are implemented.


Call to Action


ACIL is urging regulators, lawmakers, and industry leaders to take immediate steps to address the issues raised in the report. The organisation also invites industry insiders to come forward with information, whether anonymously or confidentially, to help create a fairer and more transparent insurance system.


Join the Fight for Reform


ACIL calls on industry insiders, whistleblowers, and concerned Australians to stand with us in pushing for a fairer, more accountable insurance system. If you have information to share, ACIL encourages you to reach out anonymously or confidentially.

 
 
 

12 Comments


abongempire
4 days ago

Insightful critique on the ICA code review — you’ve highlighted key areas where deeper reform could benefit the industry. Thoughtful policy analysis like this elevates the conversation, abangempire values the clarity and nuance in your response!

Like

abongempire
4 days ago

Thoughtful critique and timely perspectives here. It’s important to dig deeper than surface-level responses in policymaking discussions. tuankuda and I found your arguments compelling and well-articulated. Keep up the great analytical work!

Like

abongempire
5 days ago

Interesting read and important discussion — appreciate you putting this out there! — abangempire


Like

abongempire
5 days ago

Interesting perspective on ACIL’s review response — it’s always engaging to see critical analysis and thoughtful debate about industry policy and codes. Discussions like this help readers think more deeply about governance and accountability. Thanks for sharing your viewpoint, tuankuda! 

Like

abongempire
6 days ago

Your commentary on the ICA code review response highlights important industry concerns and invites deeper thinking about regulatory standards. It’s valuable to see thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the surface. tuankuda would value the insight and the way you challenge readers to consider broader implications.

Like
bottom of page